www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

North Dakota: 2011-2012

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Troy Huff

275

0.439

48%

60%

36%

22%

20%

33%

30%

16%

77%

0.42

58%

Patrick Mitchell

204

0.564

15%

67%

90%

23%

40%

53%

62%

38%

92%

0.17

77%

Jamal Webb

182

0.527

38%

54%

19%

22%

38%

27%

40%

38%

89%

0.32

57%

Aaron Anderson

164

0.637

43%

60%

12%

23%

45%

6%

34%

46%

85%

0.55

75%

Brandon Brekke

135

0.648

64%

76%

68%

36%

50%

42%

0%

---

---

0.48

54%

Josh Schuler

119

0.524

4%

20%

100%

42%

40%

20%

54%

36%

87%

0.38

80%

Jordan Allard

80

0.453

48%

61%

70%

36%

28%

50%

16%

23%

100%

0.62

46%

Lenny Antwi

39

0.470

18%

57%

0%

31%

42%

40%

51%

30%

83%

0.31

50%

Mitch Wilmer

34

0.507

44%

53%

88%

56%

42%

50%

0%

---

---

0.76

58%

Doug Archer

14

0.672

43%

83%

40%

29%

75%

100%

29%

25%

100%

0.36

60%

Josh Gentry

11

0.325

27%

33%

0%

45%

20%

0%

27%

0%

---

0.55

83%

Mike Mathison

11

0.558

45%

40%

50%

36%

75%

67%

18%

50%

100%

0.64

43%

Spencer Goodman

10

0.525

50%

40%

50%

10%

0%

---

40%

50%

100%

0.30

67%

Nick Haugen

4

0.000

0%

---

---

25%

0%

---

75%

0%

---

0.00

---

Dan Stockdale

2

0.508

0%

---

---

100%

50%

0%

0%

---

---

1.00

50%

Brandon Breeke

1

1.000

100%

100%

0%

0%

---

---

0%

---

---

0.00

---

TEAM

1285

0.533

37%

62%

45%

28%

38%

35%

35%

33%

88%

0.41

62%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

26%

55%

16%

66%

2pt Jumpers

39%

36%

8%

39%

3pt Shots

35%

35%

2%

35%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

13%

57%

47%

68%

22%

31%

31%

40%

Rebound, 11-35 s

23%

53%

30%

60%

30%

45%

40%

36%

Opp score, 0-10 s

5%

38%

45%

55%

14%

29%

41%

15%

Opp score, 11-35 s

38%

49%

29%

56%

32%

40%

39%

34%

Steal, 0-10 s

8%

78%

84%

76%

7%

67%

9%

71%

Steal, 11-35 s

2%

26%

16%

33%

32%

17%

53%

20%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

59%

53%

78%

6%

0%

41%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

8%

48%

26%

50%

25%

32%

49%

37%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against NORTH DAKOTA.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

13%

47%

36%

49%

23%

37%

41%

34%

Rebound, 11-35 s

23%

48%

26%

58%

38%

35%

36%

37%

Opp score, 0-10 s

6%

39%

30%

68%

31%

30%

39%

16%

Opp score, 11-35 s

38%

45%

19%

58%

44%

30%

37%

37%

Steal, 0-10 s

8%

48%

51%

46%

19%

47%

30%

33%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

45%

23%

43%

35%

45%

42%

31%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

47%

24%

75%

35%

33%

41%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

8%

46%

18%

47%

52%

37%

30%

40%

Updated 2012-10-26